The ideal of the “therapeutic partnership” is characterized by a consensus of assessments on the meaningfulness of therapeutic options in a doctor-patient relationship. However, the reality of life in society reveals a pluralism of moral concepts of rightness and convictions of conscience, often caused by different cultural or social influences. These are not only based on the part of patients and their relatives, but also on the part of those providing treatment and the - possibly denominationally bound - institutions. The law is caught in the disruptive field of tension between the demand for standardization for the sake of care security and the recognition of highly personal freedom, especially for minorities.
Coors, Michael
Wallner, Jürgen
Weilert, A. Katarina
Neitzke, Gerald
Bobbert, Monika
Böhme, Hendrik
Publication Type: Anthology
Publication Category: University Press
Language: German
Articles
-
1. Thematische Einführung (Pages 11-17)
-
2. Kulturelle und moralische Diversität in der ethischen Reflexion (Pages 19-30)
-
3. Korporative „Gewissensfreiheit“ von Gesundheitseinrichtungen? (Pages 31-56)
-
4. Gewissensentscheidungen im medizinischen Kontext – eine verfassungsrechtliche Einordnung (Pages 57-73)
-
5. Die Indikation im Spannungsfeld von moralischer und kultureller Diversität (Pages 75-87)
-
6. Medizinische Versorgung von Menschen mit einer Behinderung – das Diskriminierungsverbot aus ethischer Sicht (Pages 89-134)
-
7. Gesundheitsversorgung zwischen sinnhafter Leistung und Achtung der individuellen Selbstbestimmung (Pages 135-143)